Screener
RULE vs MOOD
Adaptive Core ETF vs Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
Key differences
- MOOD costs 1.11% less per year.
- MOOD is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, MOOD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | MOOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 0.73% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $116M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 14.13% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -14.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and MOOD
Explore further