Screener
RULE vs CCOR
Adaptive Core ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- CCOR costs 0.55% less per year.
- RULE is classified as mixed asset, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RULE follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $28M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and CCOR
Explore further