Screener
RULE vs DRSK
Adaptive Core ETF vs Aptus Defined Risk ETF
Key differences
- DRSK costs 1.06% less per year.
- DRSK is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RULE is classified as mixed asset, while DRSK is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RULE follows a active selection strategy; DRSK uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | DRSK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.72% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +9.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 8.23% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -19.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and DRSK
Explore further