Screener
RULE vs XNAV
Adaptive Core ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- XNAV costs 0.57% less per year.
- RULE is classified as mixed asset, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $31M |
| Since | 2021 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and XNAV
Explore further