Screener
RWJ vs IWB
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
Both RWJ and IWB are equity ETFs. RWJ charges 0.39% a year and IWB 0.15%. The main difference: IWB costs 0.24% less per year.
- IWB costs 0.24% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than RWJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWJ | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $48.9B |
| Since | 2008 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.6% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.42% | 12.22% |
| Max drawdown | -51.33% | -34.60% |
Similar to RWJ and IWB
Explore further