Screener
RWK vs XLG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Key differences
- XLG costs 0.19% less per year.
- XLG is significantly larger than RWK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWK | XLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $10.7B |
| Since | 2008 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 0.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +26.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | +16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.84% | 13.50% |
| Max drawdown | -46.20% | -30.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWK and XLG
Explore further