Screener
RWL vs PSCF
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
Key differences
- PSCF costs 0.10% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than PSCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | PSCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $25M |
| Since | 2008 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.9% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.14% | 17.56% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and PSCF
Explore further