Screener
RWL vs RFG
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RWL is significantly larger than RFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $329M |
| Since | 2008 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.9% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.14% | 18.50% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -42.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and RFG
Explore further