Screener
RWL vs RSPA
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
Key differences
- RSPA costs 0.10% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than RSPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWL is classified as equity, while RSPA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RWL follows a index tracking strategy; RSPA uses option income.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | RSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $748M |
| Since | 2008 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 9.12% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 9.46% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -15.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and RSPA
Explore further