Skip to content
Screener

RYLD vs RDTE

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF vs Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

RYLD

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$1.3B

RDTE

Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.97%

Fund size

$162M

Key differences

Both RYLD and RDTE are alternative ETFs. RYLD charges 0.60% a year and RDTE 0.97%. The main difference: RYLD costs 0.37% less per year.

  • RYLD costs 0.37% less per year.
  • RYLD is much larger than RDTE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RYLDRDTE
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.97%
Fund size (AUM)$1.3B$162M
Since20192024
Dividend yield11.65%45.02%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1Y+20.5%+27.0%
CAGR 3Y+7.4%N/A
CAGR 5Y+2.5%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.34N/A
Volatility 1Y10.71%17.22%
Max drawdown-41.52%-24.32%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to RYLD and RDTE