Screener
RYLD vs QRMI
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
- RYLD is significantly larger than QRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| RYLD | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $16M |
| Since | 2019 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 11.85% | 12.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.1% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.4% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.82% | 5.77% |
| Max drawdown | -41.52% | -20.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RYLD and QRMI
Explore further