Screener
RYLG vs BKCH
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X Blockchain ETF
Key differences
- RYLG costs 0.15% less per year.
- BKCH is significantly larger than RYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RYLG is classified as alternative, while BKCH is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RYLG follows a option income strategy; BKCH uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RYLG | BKCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $314M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 7.42% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +108.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +61.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 70.40% |
| Max drawdown | -22.37% | -91.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RYLG and BKCH
Explore further