Screener
RYLG vs QYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- RYLG costs 0.25% less per year.
- QYLD is significantly larger than RYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RYLG | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $8.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 7.42% | 11.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -22.37% | -24.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RYLG and QYLD
Explore further