Screener
RZG vs GRPZ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
Key differences
- RZG is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RZG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RZG | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $121M | $3M |
| Since | 2006 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.58% | 17.82% |
| Max drawdown | -54.02% | -27.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RZG and GRPZ
Explore further