Screener
RZG vs RPV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RPV is significantly larger than RZG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| RZG | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $121M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 2.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.3% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.58% | 12.77% |
| Max drawdown | -54.02% | -50.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RZG and RPV
Explore further