Screener
RZV vs QVMS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Key differences
- QVMS costs 0.20% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RZV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RZV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RZV | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $232M |
| Since | 2006 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.36% | 1.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.3% | +36.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.87% | 17.78% |
| Max drawdown | -60.42% | -28.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RZV and QVMS
Explore further