Screener
SAGP vs EEMA
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
- EEMA costs 0.16% less per year.
- EEMA is significantly larger than SAGP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAGP covers global markets; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- SAGP follows a active selection strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAGP | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +52.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -22.90% | -44.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAGP and EEMA
Explore further