Screener
EEMA vs GMF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Key differences
- EEMA is significantly larger than GMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMA is classified as equity, while GMF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMA | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $386M |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.6% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.95% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -44.18% | -40.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEMA and GMF
Explore further