Screener
SAGP vs MEMA
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF vs Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
Key differences
- SAGP costs 0.20% less per year.
- SAGP is significantly larger than MEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAGP is classified as equity, while MEMA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SAGP covers global markets; MEMA covers emerging markets.
- SAGP follows a active selection strategy; MEMA uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAGP | MEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $12M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.90% | -13.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAGP and MEMA
Explore further