Screener
SAGP vs XCNY
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.46% less per year.
- SAGP is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAGP covers global markets; XCNY covers emerging markets.
- SAGP follows a active selection strategy; XCNY uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAGP | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $9M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +36.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 16.58% |
| Max drawdown | -22.90% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAGP and XCNY
Explore further