Screener
SAMM vs IPAC
Strategas Macro Momentum ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.56% less per year.
- IPAC is significantly larger than SAMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMM follows a active selection strategy; IPAC uses index tracking.
- IPAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMM | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.2% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.03% | 16.62% |
| Max drawdown | -24.09% | -31.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMM and IPAC
Explore further