Screener
IPAC vs EPP
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.38% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IPAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAC | EPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2014 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 3.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.58% | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -31.00% | -39.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAC and EPP
Explore further