Screener
SAMT vs BFLX
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.26% less per year.
- SAMT is classified as alternative, while BFLX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | — |
| Since | 2022 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -0.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and BFLX
Explore further