Screener
SAMT vs CTA
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.09% less per year.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; CTA uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | CTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +12.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 19.97% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -18.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and CTA
Explore further