Screener
SAMT vs ISMF
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.14% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than ISMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $57M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 2.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and ISMF
Explore further