Screener
SAMT vs EEMA
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
- EEMA costs 0.17% less per year.
- SAMT is classified as alternative, while EEMA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +52.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -44.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and EEMA
Explore further