Screener
SAMT vs FFLS
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
Both SAMT and FFLS are alternative ETFs. SAMT charges 0.66% a year and FFLS 1.60%. The main difference: SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- SAMT costs 0.94% less per year.
- SAMT is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $706M | $43M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 0.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.7% | -4.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.31% | 9.33% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -11.05% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.