Screener
SAMT vs HFGM
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.35% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than HFGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | HFGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $133M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 5.05% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.3% | +42.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.45 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 22.77% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -10.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and HFGM
Explore further