Screener
SAMT vs IPAC
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.57% less per year.
- IPAC is significantly larger than SAMT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT is classified as alternative, while IPAC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; IPAC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IPAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 16.62% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -31.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and IPAC
Explore further