Screener
SAMT vs XCNY
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.47% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT is classified as alternative, while XCNY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; XCNY uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $9M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +36.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 16.58% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and XCNY
Explore further