Screener
SAMT vs EMXC
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
- EMXC costs 0.41% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than SAMT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT is classified as alternative, while EMXC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; EMXC uses index tracking.
- EMXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $22.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +73.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 21.58% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and EMXC
Explore further