Screener
SAMT vs XFLX
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs FundX Flexible ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.31% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than XFLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT is classified as alternative, while XFLX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; XFLX uses active selection.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | XFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $49M |
| Since | 2022 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 9.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 3.53% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -6.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and XFLX
Explore further