Screener
SAMT vs XNAV
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.61% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $31M |
| Since | 2022 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and XNAV
Explore further