Screener
SAWG vs QINT
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF vs American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
Key differences
- QINT costs 0.15% less per year.
- QINT is significantly larger than SAWG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAWG covers north america markets; QINT covers global.
- SAWG follows a active selection strategy; QINT uses index tracking.
- QINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAWG | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $590M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 2.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.6% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.51% | 14.85% |
| Max drawdown | -18.68% | -33.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAWG and QINT
Explore further