Screener
SAWG vs PSET
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF vs Principal Quality ETF
Key differences
- PSET costs 0.34% less per year.
- PSET is significantly larger than SAWG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAWG follows a active selection strategy; PSET uses index tracking.
- PSET has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAWG | PSET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $33M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 0.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.6% | +8.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.51% | 12.82% |
| Max drawdown | -18.68% | -34.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAWG and PSET
Explore further