Screener
SAWS vs SCHG
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- SCHG costs 0.51% less per year.
- SCHG is significantly larger than SAWS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAWS follows a active selection strategy; SCHG uses index tracking.
- SCHG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAWS | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $55.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.2% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.10% | 15.60% |
| Max drawdown | -22.04% | -34.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAWS and SCHG
Explore further