Screener
SBAR vs CGSD
Simplify Barrier Income ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSD costs 0.50% less per year.
- CGSD is significantly larger than SBAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SBAR is classified as alternative, while CGSD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SBAR follows a option income strategy; CGSD uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SBAR | CGSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $291M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 12.88% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.58% | 1.46% |
| Max drawdown | -5.32% | -1.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SBAR and CGSD
Explore further