Screener
SBAR vs CGCP
Simplify Barrier Income ETF vs Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
Key differences
- CGCP costs 0.41% less per year.
- CGCP is significantly larger than SBAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SBAR is classified as alternative, while CGCP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SBAR covers north america markets; CGCP covers global.
- SBAR follows a option income strategy; CGCP uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SBAR | CGCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $291M | $7.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 12.88% | 5.14% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.58% | 3.74% |
| Max drawdown | -5.32% | -15.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SBAR and CGCP
Explore further