Screener
SBB vs TWM
ProShares Short SmallCap600 vs ProShares UltraShort Russell2000
Key differences
- TWM is significantly larger than SBB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SBB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SBB | TWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $47M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.56% | 5.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -24.0% | -52.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -10.9% | -31.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.6% | -18.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.62 | -0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.05% | 38.52% |
| Max drawdown | -72.82% | -96.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SBB and TWM
Explore further