Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TWM vs SDD

ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 vs ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600

TWM

ProShares UltraShort Russell2000

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$47M

SDD

ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$2M

Key differences

  • TWM is significantly larger than SDD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SDD has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

TWMSDD
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$47M$2M
Since20072007
Dividend yield5.86%6.06%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-52.8%-42.9%
CAGR 3Y-31.2%-25.4%
CAGR 5Y-18.9%-15.7%
Sharpe 3Y-0.75-0.58
Volatility 1Y38.52%36.23%
Max drawdown-96.59%-96.15%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to TWM and SDD