Screener
SBIO vs RFFC
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
Both SBIO and RFFC are equity ETFs. SBIO charges 0.50% a year and RFFC 0.48%. The main difference: SBIO follows a index tracking strategy; RFFC uses active selection.
- SBIO follows a index tracking strategy; RFFC uses active selection.
- SBIO is much larger than RFFC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SBIO | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $30M |
| Since | 2014 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +63.4% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | +12.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.61% | 12.26% |
| Max drawdown | -63.06% | -36.26% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.