Screener
SCC vs RXI
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary vs iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF
Key differences
- RXI costs 0.56% less per year.
- RXI is significantly larger than SCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCC follows a inverse strategy; RXI uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RXI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCC | RXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $268M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 4.67% | 1.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -22.0% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -28.7% | +12.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -16.6% | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.69 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.33% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -95.55% | -35.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCC and RXI
Explore further