Screener
SCHA vs FFSM
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHA follows a index tracking strategy; FFSM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHA | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22.1B | — |
| Since | 2009 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.0% | +37.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.08% | 17.99% |
| Max drawdown | -42.41% | -26.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHA and FFSM
Explore further