Screener
SCHC vs FFSM
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF vs Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHC follows a index tracking strategy; FFSM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHC | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.5B | — |
| Since | 2010 | — |
| Dividend yield | 3.34% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.9% | +37.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.0% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.45% | 17.99% |
| Max drawdown | -43.94% | -26.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHC and FFSM
Explore further