Screener
SCHF vs KAT
Schwab International Equity ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- SCHF costs 0.72% less per year.
- SCHF is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHF follows a index tracking strategy; KAT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHF | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $63.0B | $688M |
| Since | 2009 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.11% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.72% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.87% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHF and KAT
Explore further