Screener
SCHF vs GKAT
Schwab International Equity ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- SCHF costs 0.56% less per year.
- SCHF is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHF follows a index tracking strategy; GKAT uses active selection.
- SCHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHF | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $63.0B | $158M |
| Since | 2009 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.11% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.72% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.87% | -10.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHF and GKAT
Explore further