Screener
SCHG vs CAML
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF vs Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- SCHG costs 0.61% less per year.
- SCHG is significantly larger than CAML — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHG follows a index tracking strategy; CAML uses active selection.
- SCHG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHG | CAML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55.6B | $376M |
| Since | 2009 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +15.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.60% | 14.65% |
| Max drawdown | -34.59% | -21.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHG and CAML
Explore further