Screener
SCHG vs IWF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- SCHG costs 0.14% less per year.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55.6B | $124.7B |
| Since | 2009 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.2% | +26.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | +15.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.60% | 15.55% |
| Max drawdown | -34.59% | -32.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHG and IWF
Explore further