Screener
SCHG vs IWO
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- SCHG costs 0.20% less per year.
- SCHG is significantly larger than IWO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHG | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55.6B | $13.9B |
| Since | 2009 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +40.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.2% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.60% | 21.33% |
| Max drawdown | -34.59% | -42.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHG and IWO
Explore further