Screener
SCHO vs TYA
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF vs Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- SCHO costs 0.22% less per year.
- SCHO is significantly larger than TYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHO follows a index tracking strategy; TYA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHO | TYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12.5B | $67M |
| Since | 2010 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.97% | 3.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | -4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.20 | -0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.38% | 13.04% |
| Max drawdown | -5.69% | -51.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHO and TYA
Explore further